The Healthcare Crisis No One Talks About: It's an IT Problem - Part 1

Introduction

America's healthcare debate usually centers around cost, coverage, or politics. But behind the headlines and heated arguments lies a foundational failure that quietly derails everything from accurate prescriptions to public health data: the lack of a secure, universal digital identity for every U.S. citizen. This isn’t just a bureaucratic oversight; it’s a deeply rooted IT problem that undermines healthcare delivery, patient safety, and national security.

1. No Unique Identifier = Systemic Dysfunction

Unlike many developed countries, the U.S. has no national digital identity. Instead, healthcare systems rely on patchwork identifiers like names, birthdates, and addresses. But these are not reliable identifiers. Names change or are misspelled. Addresses are temporary, especially among low-income populations. And newborns often go unnamed for days or weeks. In the data world, this creates an error-prone environment that leads to duplicate records, misidentifications, and administrative waste.

What is a Unique Identifier? A unique identifier is a number, code, or digital token that can reliably identify one person — and only that person — across different systems. Think of it like a digital fingerprint. Just like no two people have the same fingerprint, no two people should share the same unique identifier. It's used to match your records, verify your identity, and make sure your information doesn't get mixed up with someone else’s.

2. The Social Security Number is Obsolete

• While the SSN pool has not been fully exhausted thanks to randomized assignment introduced in 2011, its overuse has increased the risk of duplication and fraud.

• Banks and financial institutions have co-opted SSNs for authentication, making them prime targets for identity theft.

• People are increasingly hesitant to share their SSNs, even with legitimate healthcare providers, for fear of financial loss.

3. Fragmented Systems, Disconnected Data

Each state maintains its own healthcare systems and data repositories. There is minimal interoperability, and states rarely share information with one another or with the federal government. This means your medical history in California may be invisible to a provider in Texas. Without a central identity anchor, there's no way to unify or cross-reference records effectively.

4. A Broken Prescription Monitoring System

Prescription drug abuse is a national epidemic, yet our monitoring systems are state-bound and disconnected. A patient can receive a prescription for opioids in Michigan and then drive to New Orleans for a second, with no alert triggered. Some pharmaceutical companies attempt to self-police, but there is no unified federal infrastructure to track controlled substances tied to a verified individual.

While the DEA does operate the ARCOS system to monitor drug distribution at the manufacturer and distributor level, there is no federal-level patient-based tracking. State-run Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) exist but are fragmented and poorly integrated across state lines.

5. Healthcare and Financial Data Should Not Share Identifiers

Using the same identifier for medical and financial records is a security disaster waiting to happen. If a hacker compromises someone’s medical record (which often includes their SSN), they can potentially access financial accounts too. The federal government must issue separate identifiers: one for healthcare, another for financial systems. This would contain the blast radius of any breach and protect citizens from cascading consequences.

6. The Flawed Trio: Name, Birthdate, Address

• Babies may not be named immediately at birth.

• People change addresses frequently, especially in lower-income communities.

• Typos, duplicate names, and cultural naming conventions create countless opportunities for mismatched or fragmented records.

This makes tracking health outcomes, ensuring continuity of care, and managing insurance claims a nightmare.

7. Vaccine and Drug Safety: Lost in the Data Void

How do we know if a vaccine is safe? How do we track long-term side effects of new medications? Currently, the U.S. relies on self-reported adverse events and limited observational studies. Without a secure way to link medical events across time and systems, there is no way to measure real-world outcomes accurately.

Another major flaw is that subtle, low-frequency side effects may go entirely unnoticed until they reach critical mass. Often, issues are only flagged if they are widespread enough to be recognized by multiple hospitals or healthcare providers at the same time. Without consistent, centralized tracking, these signals get lost in the noise, putting lives at risk and delaying corrective action.

A universal identifier would enable safe, privacy-respecting pharmacovigilance and build public trust in medicine.

8. It’s Time to Build a True Digital Identity Infrastructure

The fix is not theoretical. Countries like Estonia, India, and even parts of Africa have implemented successful digital ID systems that balance privacy and interoperability. It’s important to note that these systems also raise privacy and surveillance concerns — which the U.S. must address through strong legal safeguards and citizen oversight.

Yet one of the biggest barriers to progress is public skepticism. Many Americans are wary of giving the government too much information, fearing surveillance or loss of freedom. However, we must also recognize the contradiction: we willingly share vast amounts of personal data with private corporations, social media platforms, and even foreign-owned apps — often with far fewer protections.

If we can entrust private companies with our most sensitive information, then we should demand our government handle it even more responsibly — with transparency, security, and accountability. A well-designed digital identity system can strike this balance, giving citizens control over their data while equipping public systems with the tools they need to protect us all.

The U.S. needs:

• A universal, secure, healthcare-specific identifier

• Separate financial identifiers for banking and credit

• Federal standards for interoperable healthcare systems

This infrastructure wouldn’t just benefit healthcare. It would reduce fraud, improve emergency response, and empower research with accurate, real-time data.

Conclusion

Healthcare in the United States will remain broken until we solve the identity problem at its core. This is not a political issue or a policy debate — it’s an IT problem that requires technical leadership, national willpower, and a serious investment in modern infrastructure. If we want a healthcare system that is safe, efficient, and future-proof, we must start by fixing how we identify the people it’s meant to serve.

Click here for part 2